<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Suimple &#187; Search Engine Optimization</title>
	<atom:link href="http://suimple.com/user-interface-design/search-engine-optimization/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://suimple.com</link>
	<description>design for  SEO, increased conversions and usability</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 15:53:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>How to Build Quality Traffic</title>
		<link>http://suimple.com/build-quality-website-traffic/73</link>
		<comments>http://suimple.com/build-quality-website-traffic/73#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 23:07:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Optimization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://suimplehost.com/new-site/?p=73</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Everyday I get a forwarded e-mail from a client wondering if this particular piece of SEO spam is the trick to generating more traffic for their site or should we use this company to boost our Google Page Rank. My answer is always NO. The only way to build quality traffic is by providing something [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://suimple.com/build-quality-website-traffic/73/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Page Naming for SEO and Usability</title>
		<link>http://suimple.com/seo-page-names/266</link>
		<comments>http://suimple.com/seo-page-names/266#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2006 18:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Small Changes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://suimplehost.com/new-site/?p=266</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Years ago I had a manger that cared passionately about accessible URL’s. To this day I am not sure if he had OCD, a bad URL childhood experience or if he just hated to type. An amazon.com product URL could literally reduce this man to tears. New Series: Small Changes and DIY Tweaks He may [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://suimple.com/seo-page-names/266/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I Can&#8242;t Stand a Hypocrite&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://suimple.com/keywords-in-images/311</link>
		<comments>http://suimple.com/keywords-in-images/311#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Sep 2006 20:06:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Search Engine Optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Small Changes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Usability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://suimplehost.com/new-site/?p=311</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[…especially when that hypocrite is me. For the last couple of weeks I have been vilifying the practice of embedding text, especially keyword rich text, in images. A good Web designer knows that this practice is bad for SEO and can cause problems with accessibility. Well this week I am going to have to stop [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://suimple.com/keywords-in-images/311/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
